SAT solvers usually expect boolean formulas in this form, because they are specialized to solve problems in this form efficiently. I decided to use this form to validate results of the LLM output with a SAT solver.
Грудь напоказ и голые ягодицы.Кто из звезд оголился на «Оскаре»?3 марта 2025。业内人士推荐服务器推荐作为进阶阅读
，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
ConsCompared to other top PLR sites, this one is a bit more expensive.，推荐阅读WPS官方版本下载获取更多信息
Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
await dropNew.writer.write(chunk2); // ok